REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE
KV #19905-9705 PR dated 02.04.2013.
FOUNDERS
RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS (KHARKIV, UKRAINE)
According to the decision No. 802 of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine dated 14.03.2024, is registered as a subject in the field of print media. ID R30-03156
PUBLISHER
Liburkina L. M.
SITE SECTIONS
Main page
Editorial staff
Editorial policy
Annotated catalogue (2011)
Annotated catalogue (2012)
Annotated catalogue (2013)
Annotated catalogue (2014)
Annotated catalogue (2015)
Annotated catalogue (2016)
Annotated catalogue (2017)
Annotated catalogue (2018)
Annotated catalogue (2019)
Annotated catalogue (2020)
Annotated catalogue (2021)
Annotated catalogue (2022)
Annotated catalogue (2023)
Annotated catalogue (2024)
Annotated catalogue (2025)
Thematic sections of the journal
Proceedings of scientific conferences
|
 Energy Diplomacy in the Age of Renewables: Shifts in Global Energy Alliances Liubachivska R. Z.
Liubachivska, Roksoliana Z. (2025) “Energy Diplomacy in the Age of Renewables: Shifts in Global Energy Alliances.” Business Inform 5:68–77. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2025-5-68-77
Section: International Economic Relations
Article is written in UkrainianDownloads/views: 0 | Download article (pdf) -  |
UDC 327:620.92:339.9
Abstract: The article analyzes the significant shift in the global energy landscape driven by the transition from the dominance of fossil fuels to the increasing role of renewable energy sources. The introduction outlines this transition as a profound geopolitical reconfiguration that fundamentally changes the goals, actors, and mechanisms of energy diplomacy, opening a «new geopolitical order». The aim of the article is to analyze how the global transition to renewable energy sources transforms energy diplomacy, particularly by identifying and explaining key changes in global energy alliances. The study is based on geopolitical theory and international political economy, adapting them to consider the distributed nature of renewable energy and new dependencies in supply chains. A comparative analytical approach is applied to contrast traditional and new energy diplomacy, as well as a case study method to illustrate specific instances of alliance changes. Examples include the EU’s strategy on critical raw materials, China’s dominance in renewable energy production, the U.S. domestic green industrial policy (Inflation Reduction Act), and russia’s adaptive strategies. The research is based on qualitative analysis of peer-reviewed academic journals, reports from international organizations (IEA, IRENA), government policy documents, and analyses from reputable think tanks. The results indicate a fundamental transformation in the definition of energy security – from ensuring a stable flow of fossil fuels to guaranteeing the resilience of renewable energy infrastructure, the security of supply chains for critical minerals, and the cybersecurity of digitized energy networks. While renewable energy sources offer potential for decentralized production, they simultaneously introduce new, concentrated dependencies on critical minerals (lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements) and production capabilities (China’s dominance). This creates a new form of geopolitical influence and fuels the «green technology race». Traditional producer – consumer relations are being reconfigured, forcing fossil fuel exporters to diversify markets (for example, russia’s reorientation towards Asia), while consumers are seeking new partnerships for renewable energy components. New alliances are emerging based on technologies, green finance, and the supply of critical minerals, including partnerships in green hydrogen and climate coalitions. The energy transition is characterized by a complex duality of cooperation and competition, where shared climate goals coexist with increasing rivalry for resources and technological dominance, and the imperative of a «just transition» becomes a crucial diplomatic task. The conclusions emphasize that the energy transition is a profound geopolitical reshaping that requires a holistic approach to energy security. Proactive supply diversification and international cooperation on critical raw materials are recommended, as well as prioritizing a «just transition» to ensure global equity in access to energy. The article makes a significant contribution to the theory of international relations by demonstrating how material changes lead to a reconfiguration of power dynamics and alliance structures. Future research prospects include studying the mechanisms of resilient supply chains for critical minerals, the growing role of non-State actors, and the long-term consequences of «green mercantilism».
Keywords: energy diplomacy, renewable energy sources, global energy alliances, energy geopolitics, energy security, green transition.
Tabl.: 2. Bibl.: 32.
Liubachivska Roksoliana Z. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Department of European Economics and Business, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman (54/1 Beresteiskyi Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine) Email: [email protected]
List of references in article
“International Energy Agency“. Electricity. 2025. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2025/global-trends
“The Shattered Mirror of Globalisation: Unveiling the Consequences for the Electricity Industry“. Energy Central (n.d.). https://energycentral.com/c/cp/shattered-mirror-globalisation-unveiling-consequences-electricity-industry
The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition. Springer, 2020.
Yang, Yu., Xia, S., and Qian, X. “Geopolitics of energy transition“. Journal of Geographical Sciences, vol. 33, no. 4 (2023): 683-704. DOI: 10.1007/s11442-023-2101-2
Huda, M. S. “Renewable energy diplomacy and transitions: An environmental peacebuilding approach“. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol. 50 (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100815
Proedrou, F. “Geopolitical Implications of the Global Energy Transition for the EU“. In EU Energy Geopolitics. Environmental Politics and Theory, 85-121. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham., 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81584-3_4
“Brief History“. Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. https://www.opec.org/brief-history.html
Zumwalt-Forbes, A. “Profitability and power: Fixing US critical minerals supply chains“. Atlantic Council. April 03, 2025. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/energysource/profitability-and-power-fixing-us-critical-minerals-supply-chains/
McBride, M., and Helmeci, D. “Minerals, Manufacturing, and Markets: Foreign Policy for US Energy, Technology, and Minerals“. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. February 26, 2025. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/02/minerals-manufacturing-and-markets-foreign-policy-for-us-energy-technology-and-minerals?lang=en
Allan, B. et al. “How the U.S. Can Stop Losing the Race for Clean Energy“. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. February 26, 2025. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/02/how-the-us-can-stop-losing-the-race-for-clean-energy
Brothers, K. “Powering the future: America's perception on critical minerals“. Missouri S&T. March 11, 2025. https://news.mst.edu/2025/03/powering-the-future-americas-perception-on-critical-minerals/
Hebbale, C. “Geopolitics of Green Hydrogen: Energy Competition in the Fight for Net Zero“. Johns Hopkins School of Advanced. International Studies. April 13, 2023. http://www.saisperspectives.com/22-23issue/greenhydrogen
Flint, C. Introduction to Geopolitics. London: Routledge, 2016.
Okunev, I. “A New Dimension of Russia's Geopolitical Code“. Turkish Policy Quarterly. 2013. https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/folder/fpblxoriet/89307967.pdf
“Geopolitical Codes“. Utah State University. https://chass.usu.edu/international-studies/aggies-go/geopolitical-codes
Finley, M., and Gross, S. “Navigating market and political uncertainties in the age of energy transition“. Brookings. 2025. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/navigating-market-and-political-uncertainties-in-the-age-of-energy-transition/
Green, N. et al. “Hardwiring the energy transition into energy security“. Brookings. 2025. https://www.e3g.org/publications/hardwiring-the-energy-transition-into-energy-security/
“Joint article on Just Energy Transition Partnerships“. GOV.UK. 2025. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/joint-article-on-just-energy-transition-partnerships
“Realizing the Potential of Just Energy Transition Partnerships in the Current Geopolitical Environment“. Columbia University. 2025. https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/publications/realizing-the-potential-of-just-energy-transition-partnerships-in-the-current-geopolitical-environment/
“Global Energy Alliance for People and Planet“. About Us. https://energyalliance.org/
Rudiany, N. P. et al. “The Role of Cities in Energy Diplomacy: Indonesia, Japan and the Surabaya-Kitakyushu Partnership“. Brill. November 15, 2021. https://brill.com/view/journals/hjd/aop/article-10.1163-1871191X-bja10082/article-10.1163-1871191X-bja10082.xml
Aprianto, D. “Indonesia's Energy Diplomacy to Promote Nuclear Energy as an Alternative to Energy Security“. Jurnal Pertahanan Media, vol. 10, no. 2 (2024): 270-280. DOI: 10.33172/jp.v10i2.19611
Engel-Cox1, J. A. “Clean energy technology pathways from research to commercialization: Policy and practice case studies“. Frontiers in Energy Research. November 09, 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.1011990
Gerring, J. “Case Study Research: Principles and Practices“. Cambridge University Press, 2007. https://www.ocw.upj.ac.id/files/Slide-PSG301-Case-study-Research.pdf
Dagnachew, A. G. et al. “A green hydrogen revolution in Africa remains elusive under current geopolitical realities“. Climate Policy, vol. 25, no. 2 (2025): 291-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2024.2376740
Blondeel, M., Price, J., and Bradshaw, M. “Global energy scenarios: A geopolitical reality check“. Global Environmental Change, vol. 84 (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102781
Smyrnov, I. et al. “The Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Global Supply Chains“. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, vol. 10, no. 12s (2025): 582-589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i12s.1866
Al-Sarihi, A. “Energy Transition in the Gulf: Best Practices and Limitations“. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2025. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/04/energy-transition-in-the-gulf-best-practices-and-limitations?lang=en
“Beyond Borders: Power Grid Interconnections and Regional Electricity Markets for the Sustainable Energy Transition“. World Bank Group. January 22, 2025. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/4020f27e-341c-4883-a3ad-b603fc82cb48
“North American Renewable Integration Study“. NREL. https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/naris
“Center of Excellence for Renewable Energy (CERE)“. University of the District of Columbia. https://www.udc.edu/seas/research-centers/renewable-energy/index
Kosnik, L.-R. “A Survey of JEL Codes: What do they Mean and are They Used Consistently?“ Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 32, no. 3 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12189
|
FOR AUTHORS
License Contract
Conditions of Publication
Article Requirements
Regulations on Peer-Reviewing
Publication Contract
Current Issue
Frequently asked questions
INFORMATION
The Plan of Scientific Conferences
OUR PARTNERS
Journal «The Problems of Economy»
|