REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE

KV #19905-9705 PR dated 02.04.2013.

 FOUNDERS

RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS (KHARKIV, UKRAINE)

According to the decision No. 802 of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine dated 14.03.2024, is registered as a subject in the field of print media.
ID R30-03156

 PUBLISHER

Liburkina L. M.

 SITE SECTIONS

Main page

Editorial staff

Editorial policy

Annotated catalogue (2011)

Annotated catalogue (2012)

Annotated catalogue (2013)

Annotated catalogue (2014)

Annotated catalogue (2015)

Annotated catalogue (2016)

Annotated catalogue (2017)

Annotated catalogue (2018)

Annotated catalogue (2019)

Annotated catalogue (2020)

Annotated catalogue (2021)

Annotated catalogue (2022)

Annotated catalogue (2023)

Annotated catalogue (2024)

Thematic sections of the journal

Proceedings of scientific conferences

The Synthesis of Management Practices at a Perfect Innovation-Active Organization
Shaulska L. V., Hrynkevych R. I.

Shaulska, Larysa V., and Hrynkevych, Roman I. (2022) “The Synthesis of Management Practices at a Perfect Innovation-Active Organization.” Business Inform 1:414–423.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2022-1-414-423

Section: Management and Marketing

UDC 658.012.23

Abstract:
The article develops an image of a perfect innovatively active organization and tests of its diagnostic capabilities at the enterprises of the machine-building industry. The current conditions of functioning of organizations that actively carry out innovative activities have led to the use of post-neoclassical managerial rationality as a converging epistemic paradigm, which allows to systematically examine the phenomenon of innovative activity. When constructing the image of a perfect innovatively active organization, the existing pool of managerial knowledge, taking into account dynamism, non-linearity, complexity and uncertainty of conditions, was systematized and synthesized on the basis of the use of synergistic approaches, which provided possibilities to form systemic ideas about the characteristics of an organization capable of organic coevolution with the external environment. The hypothesis used for the present study is as follows: the modern market environment is characterized by inequality and dynamic organization, which can be coevoluted only by applying the cognitive potential of a wide social environment. This, in turn, involves an appeal to the mechanisms of self-organization, which are able to create management models of a fundamentally different order of complexity, are sensitive to changes in the external environment, and are able to produce relevant adaptive reactions to these transformations. In the course of the study, the synergistic approach was used to select the congruent properties of a perfect innovation-active organization. The list of progressive management practices of a perfect innovation-active organization is typologized and synthesized. On the basis of the proposed image, a questionnaire is developed, allowing to diagnose the quality of management of innovative development of enterprises of the machine-building industry.

Keywords: innovation-active organization, management, co-creation, perfect organization, self-organization.

Fig.: 2. Tabl.: 1. Bibl.: 22.

Shaulska Larysa V. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Professor, Department of Enterprise Economics, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (60 Volodymyrska Str., Kyiv, 01033, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Hrynkevych Roman I. – Postgraduate Student, Department of Management and Behavioral Economics, Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University (21 600-richchia Str., Vinnytsia, 21021, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]

List of references in article

Appelo, Yu. Agile-menedzhment: Liderstvo i upravleniye komandami [Agile Management: Leadership and Team Management]. Moscow: Alpina Pablisher, 2018.
Gayselkhart, Kh. Obuchayushcheyesya predpriyatiye v XXI veke [The Learning Enterprise in the 21st Century]. Kaluga: Dukhovnoye naslediye, 2004.
Greton, L. Demokraticheskoye predpriyatiye: Raskreposhcheniye biznesa blagodarya svobode, gibkosti i priverzhennosti [Democratic Enterprise: Emancipating Business Through Freedom, Flexibility, and Commitment]. St. Petersburg: Stokgolmskaya shkola ekonomiki, 2005.
Prahalad, S. K., and Ramaswamy, V. “Co-creation experiences : The next practice in value creation“. Journal of Interactive Marketing, vol. 18, no. 3 (2004): 5-14. DOI: 10.1002/dir.20015
Khemel, G., and Zanini, M. Gumanokratiya. Kak sdelat kompaniyu takoy zhe gibkoy, smeloy i kreativnoy, kak lyudi vnutri neye [Humanocracy. How to Make a Company as Flexible, Bold and Creative as the People inside It]. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2021.
Bezgin, K. S. Upravleniye protsessom sozdaniya tsennosti na predpriyatii: polisubektnost i kollaboratsiya [Management of the Value Creation Process in an Enterprise: Polysubjectivity and Collaboration]. Kharkiv, 2015.
Zokhar, D. Kvantovyy lider: Revolyutsiya v myshlenii i praktike biznesa [Quantum Leader: A Revolution in Business Thinking and Practice]. Moscow: Sofiya, 2017.
Komarov, S. V., Bukhvalov, N. Yu., and Pustovoyt, K. S. Ot samoorganizatsii k samorazvitiyu : smena paradigmy menedzhmenta [From Self-organization to Self-development: A Change in the Management Paradigm]. Yekaterinburg, 2013.
Knyazeva, Ye. N. “Sotsialnaya slozhnost : samoorganizatsiya, trendy, innovatsii“ [Social Complexity: Self-organization, Trends, Innovations]. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kultura, no. 1 (2013): 20-28.
Shaulska, L. et al. “Drivers of macroeconomic growth in a creative economy: innovation policy and human capital“. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (2021): 178-186.
Mitchell, M. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. London: Touchstone, 1993.
Prigozhin, I., and Stengers, I. Poryadok iz khaosa: Novyy dialog cheloveka s prirodoy [Order out of Chaos: A New Dialogue between Man and Nature]. Moscow: Progress, 1986.
Khaken, G. Sinergetika [Synergetics]. Moscow: Mir, 1980.
Maturana, U., and Varela, F. Drevo poznaniya: biologicheskiye korni chelovecheskogo ponimaniya [The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya, 2001.
Hayek, F. A. “The Use of Knowledge in Society“. American Economic Review. 1945. https://www.econlib.org/library/Essays/hykKnw.html
Chesbro, G. Otkrytyye innovatsii. Sozdaniye pribylnykh tekhnologiy [Open Innovation. Creating Profitable Technologies]. Moscow: Pokoleniye, 2007.
Stark, D. “Geterarkhiya: neodnoznachnost aktivov i organizatsiya raznoobraziya“ [Heterarchy: Asset Ambiguity and the Organization of Diversity]. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya, no. 2 (2001): 115-132.
Felps, E. Massovoye protsvetaniye : Kak nizovyye innovatsii stali istochnikom rabochikh mest, novykh vozmozhnostey i izmeneniy [Mass Prosperity: How Grassroots Innovation Became a Source of Jobs, Opportunity, and Change]. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Gaydara, 2015.
Arieli, D. Pozitivnaya irratsionalnost. Kak izvlekat vygodu iz svoikh nelogichnykh postupkov [Positive Irrationality. How to Capitalize on Your Illogical Actions]. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Farber, 2010.
Druker, P. Biznes i innovatsii [Business and Innovation]. Moscow: Vilyams, 2007.
Shenkar, O. Imitatory: Kak kompanii zaimstvuyut i pererabatyvayut chuzhiye idei [Imitators: How Companies Borrow and Recycle Other People's Ideas]. Moscow: Alpina Pablisherz, 2011.
Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum, 1985.

 FOR AUTHORS

License Contract

Conditions of Publication

Article Requirements

Regulations on Peer-Reviewing

Publication Contract

Current Issue

Frequently asked questions

 INFORMATION

The Plan of Scientific Conferences

 OUR PARTNERS

Journal «The Problems of Economy»